QQQM vs VUG: ETF Comparison
Key metrics
| Metric | QQQM | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $297.05 | $88.42 |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| AUM | $108.76B | $392.20B |
| Holdings | 103 | 166 |
| Inception | Oct 13, 2020 | Jan 26, 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 0.39% |
| 1-year total return | +15.40% | +6.95% |
| 3-year total return | +112.75% | +105.13% |
| 5-year total return | +96.21% | +76.13% |
Holdings overlap
Reported holdings overlap by 61.07%. Reported weights sum to 100.12% for QQQM and 100.06% for VUG.
Performance
Total return (%)
Date
QQQMVUG
Total return from Oct 8, 2021 to Oct 27, 2026, rebased to the first date.
Top 10 holdings
QQQM top holdings
Sector weights
| Sector | QQQM | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | 58.59% | 60.22% |
| Communication Services | 11.59% | 14.74% |
| Consumer Cyclical | 10.52% | 9.75% |
| Consumer Defensive | 6.26% | 1.26% |
| Industrials | 5.76% | 4.41% |
| Healthcare | 4.38% | 4.15% |
| Financial Services | 0.33% | 3.89% |
| Utilities | 1.10% | – |
| Basic Materials | 0.99% | 0.38% |
| Real Estate | – | 0.88% |
| Energy | 0.48% | 0.30% |
| Cash & Others | 0.01% | 0.03% |
Which is better for...
- Lower fees. VUG costs less, at 0.03% versus 0.15% for QQQM.
- Income. QQQM yields more, at 0.44% versus 0.39% for VUG.
- The past year. QQQM returned more, at +15.40% versus +6.95% for VUG.
- The past five years. QQQM returned more, at +96.21% versus +76.13% for VUG.
These lines restate the figures above. They are not a recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
What is the expense ratio of QQQM vs VUG?
QQQM's expense ratio is 0.15%. VUG's expense ratio is 0.03%.
How large are QQQM and VUG?
QQQM manages $108.76B. VUG manages $392.20B.
How did QQQM and VUG perform over the past year?
The 1-year total return is +15.40% for QQQM and +6.95% for VUG.
Which has the higher dividend yield, QQQM or VUG?
QQQM's dividend yield is 0.44%. VUG's dividend yield is 0.39%.
Is this comparison investment advice?
No. This page reports published figures for QQQM and VUG. It is not a recommendation.