Editorial policy

Stocklytics publishes screens, scores, and short research notes for general education. We do not tell you what to buy. A score or an AI rating is a model output, described on the methodology page, not a personal recommendation.

Standards

Numbers on a stock page come from market data and from the calculations on the methodology page. We do not invent a price, a target, or a growth rate to fill a gap. If a model cannot run, the page says there is no estimate.

Partner links, if we add them, are disclosed on the affiliate disclosure. Payment from a partner does not change a score or the order of a screen.

AI

AI Picks and stock reports are drafted by a language model. The model is given figures we have already collected and is told to use only those figures. For AI Picks, a second check rejects a write-up that cites a number that was not in the source data, apart from the rating and confidence the model is allowed to assign. Reports are prepared ahead of time. Viewing a page does not send a new request to the model. The model is not a named analyst and it is not a person. Where a note is machine-written, that is what this page is disclosing.

The byline is Stocklytics Research Team. A named person, when one is appointed, replaces that byline on the authors page. We do not invent a person or a credential.

Corrections

If a figure or a sentence is materially wrong, use the contact form and include the page address and what you think is wrong. We will correct the page and, where the error was ours rather than a data revision, say what changed.

Complaints

To complain, use the contact form. We are not an FCA-authorised firm, so an FCA complaint scheme does not apply to this site.